Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Search

Navigation

Categories

Archives

<November 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Links










# Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Skirting the issue
Posted by Angelo

I’ll just come out and say it – I hate fender skirts. I don’t mind ruffling a few feathers among the skirt-loving crowd, because I have cars that sport them. In fact, the factory required them on some of my cars.

For a guy who doesn’t like these superfluous accessories, I keep finding cars that come standard with them. On both of my 1955 Cadillac coupes and my ’62 Cadillac Coupe deVille, the fender skirts are part of the design, and if they are left off, a huge gaping hole the size of Texas remains. Also, all of the skirt’s attachment bits and pieces are exposed, leaving the car looking like a half-dressed mannequin in a department store window. It’s not a pretty sight.

On Cadillacs, and many other cars sporting skirts from the designer’s pen, fender skirts are integrated as part of the design; they are not an afterthought. In the case of a 1950s Cadillac, it’s easy to see that the designers had a body shape in mind that involved keeping the wheel shielded as part of the body design, and the skirts were required to access the wheel.

What really drives me nuts is when people throw skirts on to their cars when their car shouldn’t have fender skirts. Cars that shouldn’t have fenders skirts make the car look heavier, out of proportion, and detract from the lines stamped into the sheet metal. It’s pretty easy to see when a car doesn’t need fender skirts. Here’s a simple test:

Did the car originally come with skirts? If the answer is no, then proceed.

Is there a lip to the fender opening? If the answer is yes, then the car should not have fender skirts.

Still not on board? Then picture this: a 1955 Chevrolet Bel Air Sport Coupe. The car features some of the best lines of the 1950s, from the close-couple hardtop roof and wrap-around front and rear glass to the downright sexy dip in the top of the fender behind the door. There’s that Ferrari-inspired grille and those handsome triangular taillights that are only slightly highlighted by the shape of the metal below them. And let’s not forget the half-open rear wheel openings that show just enough of the wheel cover, but harmonize with the side trim and front wheel opening. It’s a true triumph of design. Now, add fender skirts – it changes the car, and the effect of the body’s design gets muddied. Worse yet, add rocker trim, a continental kit, accessory bumper guards, spotlights, visor… well, you get the picture.

Like all accessories, fender skirts were tools dealers and the factory used to make money, as the profit margin was large in relation to the cost of the car.

Designers used fender lips like a signature – it showed a sign of completion to the edge of the fender. To add skirts to car with a fender lip, the owner is saying that they know more about design than the car’s designer.
If the car receiving the skirts is being customized and the whole point is to change the car’s shape, then fender skirts are an obvious choice, and it’s a whole different story. But on a restored car, I still say steer clear of fender skirts.

It’s easy to get trapped into the accessory mode, but if you get carried away, your Chevrolet will look as gaudy as Paris Hilton’s diamond-collared, sweater-wearing Chihuahua. And nobody wants to see that.








1955ChevynoskirtA.jpg1955ChevyskirtA.jpg


Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:24:45 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [9]
Saturday, March 17, 2007 12:34:16 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Do you have picture of Chevy Fender – http://www.car-stuff.com/chevroletfender.htm - installed in the car? I want to know how it looks like in place.
Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:48:29 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
I love this classic look.
Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:48:59 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
I can't help but be old school.
Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:49:48 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Nice work, keep them coming.
Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:50:36 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
I might have to consider a new hobby.
Monday, May 21, 2007 11:02:15 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
I have to agree with Angelo. Fender skirts (and Continental kits -- ugh) are just awful. They completely ruin the lines of the car!
Friday, June 01, 2007 10:18:23 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
What is the most important information I should know about levitra? You can buy cheap levitra at my homepage :)
Monday, June 04, 2007 4:53:51 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Sorry,Ange! I have to dissagree! I put FACTORY skirts on my 65 Falcon Futura ragtop,and my 65 Fairlane 2 dr post sedan.The effect is to make the rear quarters look longer.It works for me!
I even occasionally add skirts to my UN customized Hot Wheels & Matchboxes! I'm 71 now and still chase skirts!
Marty,in Hawley
Marty Vehstedt
Tuesday, July 03, 2007 1:43:49 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
I agree whole heartedly! Even worse are the so-called Continental tire kits. They totally destroy the lines that the designer created. As far as I am concerned, continental kits ruin the looks of every car not built with them from the factory, that is Continentals!
"Pat"Jacobs
Comments are closed.
Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links