Free Updates
Search
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2009 (9) |
| October, 2009 (4) |
| September, 2009 (7) |
| August, 2009 (4) |
| July, 2009 (3) |
| June, 2009 (4) |
| May, 2009 (3) |
| April, 2009 (4) |
| March, 2009 (7) |
| February, 2009 (7) |
| January, 2009 (5) |
| December, 2008 (5) |
| October, 2008 (2) |
| September, 2008 (5) |
| August, 2008 (6) |
| July, 2008 (2) |
| June, 2008 (3) |
| May, 2008 (4) |
| April, 2008 (7) |
| March, 2008 (2) |
| February, 2008 (5) |
| January, 2008 (2) |
| December, 2007 (2) |
| November, 2007 (4) |
| October, 2007 (1) |
| September, 2007 (6) |
| August, 2007 (8) |
| July, 2007 (7) |
| June, 2007 (2) |
| May, 2007 (3) |
| April, 2007 (3) |
| March, 2007 (2) |
| February, 2007 (2) |
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Links
|
 Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Bargain '50s rides
Posted by Angelo
Cars from the 1950s remain hot, and their price tags continue to reflect that fact. But while looking through the Crown Victoria Association’s publication Fomoco Times for 1954-’56 Ford enthusiasts, I noticed how relatively affordable driver-quality Crown Victorias are, and glasstop Crown Victoria Skyliners aren’t much more. It had me thinking about bargains for other cool 1955-and-later rides. Here are a few picks for wild finned and chromed cars priced at $20,000 or less: - 1957-’58 Plymouth two-door hardtops. Buy a ’57, and you can have your Tulsarama in your garage! If you don’t need a Fury, these cars can be found for $10,000-15,000 in very nice driver condition. - 1955-’56 Ford Crown Victoria – Here’s a rare instance in which the two-door sedan outclasses a hardtop. These tiara-capped beauties are from the start of Detroit’s styling heyday, and not only are they easy on the eyes, they are relatively easy on the wallet. Look for a driver needing some work to start around $15,000 and escalate quickly into the $20,000-plus range. Unfortunately, show cars start in the $30,000 range and quickly escalate into the stratosphere. If you don’t mind a challenge, restorable Crowns can be found for less than $10,000, but be prepared for paint, interior and other work to be necessary. - 1959 Chevrolet Impala Sport Coupes – Get behind the wheel of your very own Batmobile before their prices follow their fins into space. I think there’s a lot of room for prices to rise on Impalas, so get into a driver for less than $20,000, and quick! Smart shoppers will skip the top-of-the-line Impalas and make a beeline for the Bel Airs and Biscaynes that, even in two-door sedan form, are fine-looking machines. Unlike preceding years of Chevrolet production, the difference in sedan and hardtop design isn’t too different in 1959 and 1960, and both make very handsome cruisers. Of course, the real bargains lie in pre-1955 cars, many of which can be had for less than $10,000, and that’s for driver-quality two-door door models. Are there any steals for less than $20,000 missing from this list? Let me know what you think!
Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:04:14 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Sliding around in a Grand Prix
Posted by Angelo
In the April 5, 2007, issue of Old Cars, “Motorcity Milestones” columnist Byron Olsen writes about one of my favorite cars, the 1978-’87 Pontiac Grand Prix. Or, more accurately, one of my favorite winter beaters. Up north, where the snow blows cold and each state’s department of transportation liberally applies salt to roads, car collectors save their nice cars from the ravages of winter by buying already-rusty cars as winter beaters. I’ve had many winter beaters through the years, but my favorite is still the 1986 Grand Prix I drove to college and work in the winter of 1999. The car was the sporty version with bucket seats, console and a V-8. The outside didn’t have one of those ‘70s suave vinyl tops, but rather a cool two-tone blue paint scheme that was horizontally divided down the length of the car. I usually drive rear-wheel-drive GM products from the 1980s as winter beaters, and then remove their emblems and paint muscle car or upscale car names in their place. (A 1985 Regal became a GS, a 1986 Cutlass became a 442 and a 1986 Pontiac Bonneville had the “Bonn” removed and a “D” added to the front to become a Deville.) The ’ 86 Grand Prix became a GTO. I bought the Grand Prix/GTO (and all of its rust) from my cousin for $600 and proceeded to beat the snot out of it. After a fresh snow, my gas station coworkers and I regularly took the old Pontiac out to whip donuts in empty parking lots for hours on end, and the car didn’t skip a beat. And, it still took me to work and class reliably and comfortably. But all good things must come to an end. That spring, the Grand Prix/GTO was sold to make room in the driveway for the collector cars. Had it not been so rusty, I’m not sure I would have ever have parted with it. I saw the Grand Prix/GTO later that summer when I was in a different city buying 1962 Cadillac parts. It was hard to miss with its rust spots and its silver-painted “GTO” emblem glistening on its quarter panels in the summer sun. I was tempted to knock on the door and see if it was for sale, but I realized it just wouldn’t be the same car to drive without the snow on the ground.
Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:30:08 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Skirting the issue
Posted by Angelo
I’ll just come out and say it – I hate fender skirts. I don’t mind ruffling a few feathers among the skirt-loving crowd, because I have cars that sport them. In fact, the factory required them on some of my cars. For a guy who doesn’t like these superfluous accessories, I keep finding cars that come standard with them. On both of my 1955 Cadillac coupes and my ’ 62 Cadillac Coupe deVille, the fender skirts are part of the design, and if they are left off, a huge gaping hole the size of Texas remains. Also, all of the skirt’s attachment bits and pieces are exposed, leaving the car looking like a half-dressed mannequin in a department store window. It’s not a pretty sight. On Cadillacs, and many other cars sporting skirts from the designer’s pen, fender skirts are integrated as part of the design; they are not an afterthought. In the case of a 1950s Cadillac, it’s easy to see that the designers had a body shape in mind that involved keeping the wheel shielded as part of the body design, and the skirts were required to access the wheel. What really drives me nuts is when people throw skirts on to their cars when their car shouldn’t have fender skirts. Cars that shouldn’t have fenders skirts make the car look heavier, out of proportion, and detract from the lines stamped into the sheet metal. It’s pretty easy to see when a car doesn’t need fender skirts. Here’s a simple test: Did the car originally come with skirts? If the answer is no, then proceed. Is there a lip to the fender opening? If the answer is yes, then the car should not have fender skirts. Still not on board? Then picture this: a 1955 Chevrolet Bel Air Sport Coupe. The car features some of the best lines of the 1950s, from the close-couple hardtop roof and wrap-around front and rear glass to the downright sexy dip in the top of the fender behind the door. There’s that Ferrari-inspired grille and those handsome triangular taillights that are only slightly highlighted by the shape of the metal below them. And let’s not forget the half-open rear wheel openings that show just enough of the wheel cover, but harmonize with the side trim and front wheel opening. It’s a true triumph of design. Now, add fender skirts – it changes the car, and the effect of the body’s design gets muddied. Worse yet, add rocker trim, a continental kit, accessory bumper guards, spotlights, visor… well, you get the picture. Like all accessories, fender skirts were tools dealers and the factory used to make money, as the profit margin was large in relation to the cost of the car. Designers used fender lips like a signature – it showed a sign of completion to the edge of the fender. To add skirts to car with a fender lip, the owner is saying that they know more about design than the car’s designer. If the car receiving the skirts is being customized and the whole point is to change the car’s shape, then fender skirts are an obvious choice, and it’s a whole different story. But on a restored car, I still say steer clear of fender skirts. It’s easy to get trapped into the accessory mode, but if you get carried away, your Chevrolet will look as gaudy as Paris Hilton’s diamond-collared, sweater-wearing Chihuahua. And nobody wants to see that.
  
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:24:45 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Check out a museum
Posted by Angelo
With all of the advice and stories we print in Old Cars, I’m just waiting for readers to ask if we practice what we preach. The answer is “Yes!” In a recent editorial, I urged readers to hit a museum to fend off the winter blues, or to get a different experience in the hobby. The suggestion came from a trip to the Ellingson Car Museum in Rogers, Minn., that my brother and I took on a cold, snowy day during a Sunday this February. Many museums, including Ellingson, change their inventories regularly. It had been several years since I had last been at the museum, and I only recognized a couple of the cars. The selection was also good, and it appears that the museum was keeping up with hobby trends. There was a Plum Crazy Hemi ‘Cuda, an unusually correct (and very nice driver-quality) Amphicar, 1938 Maybach convertible sedan said to have been owned by a Nazi general and a “General Lee” 1969 Dodge Charger stated to have been used in filming of the TV series.  I really “dug” the museum’s 1936 Auburn convertible coupe, 1932 Plymouth coupe, Cord L-29 sedan and 1928 Hudson rumble-seat coupe. I’m a sucker for a 1957 Oldsmobile Holiday, and there was a ’57 Olds Ninety-Eight Holiday sedan in a great green shade on display. Course, the Hemi ‘Cuda wasn’t bad, either! I was also able to spot a few treats for my coworkers. Ron Kowalke would love to make a stock car out of an old “Squarebird,” and the museum had a replica 1959 Thunderbird that replicated the Holman Moody-prepped NASCAR machine. Keith Mathiowetz is restoring an Amphicar, and the car in the Museum was a twin to his car. Ellingson not only displays great cars, it offers some of its cars and those of others for sale. It’s a great way to keep money flowing in and the establishment open, and it gives local car enthusiasts a place to sell a car. I also noticed that the museum has a club room, which I assume is used by local clubs as a meeting area. What a great idea! I wonder if other clubs have done the same?!   If you want to swing by Ellingson Car Museum on your own, go to: http://www.ellingsoncarmuseum.com . Also watch for the March 22 issue of Old Cars to feature a listing of known museums, as well as several orphan cars.     
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 3:57:11 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Thursday, February 22, 2007
Welcome to the 'blog'
Posted by Angelo
Old Cars Weekly has always been about communication. Until now, the weekly “Sound Your Horn,” “When I was a Boy” and “Reader Photos” sections, as well as the other reader-driven areas of Old Cars, were the main podiums for reader thoughts and opinions. But now there’s more. To continue the communication-driven spirit of Old Cars, blogs have been unveiled on the Old Cars Web site as a new method of contact between Old Cars staff members and readers. On a regular basis, members of the Old Cars staff will post stories of our travels, experiences and thoughts on these blogs, sometimes with photographs. And the best part is, you can respond. So far, John Gunnell, who was been associated with Old Cars for nearly 30 years, and Auction and Technical Editor Ron Kowalke and I will be posting blogs that we hope will entertain you or get you thinking about trends in the hobby. Be sure to check back frequently to see what other Old Cars readers have to say!
Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:56:00 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
|