Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Search

Navigation

Categories

Archives

<November 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

Links










# Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Sliding around in a Grand Prix
Posted by Angelo

In the April 5, 2007, issue of Old Cars, “Motorcity Milestones” columnist Byron Olsen  writes about one of my favorite cars, the 1978-’87 Pontiac Grand Prix. Or, more accurately, one of my favorite winter beaters.

Up north, where the snow blows cold and each state’s department of transportation liberally applies salt to roads, car collectors save their nice cars from the ravages of winter by buying already-rusty cars as winter beaters. I’ve had many winter beaters through the years, but my favorite is still the 1986 Grand Prix I drove to college and work in the winter of 1999. The car was the sporty version with bucket seats, console and a V-8. The outside didn’t have one of those ‘70s suave vinyl tops, but rather a cool two-tone blue paint scheme that was horizontally divided down the length of the car.

I usually drive rear-wheel-drive GM products from the 1980s as winter beaters, and then remove their emblems and paint muscle car or upscale car names in their place. (A 1985 Regal became a GS, a 1986 Cutlass became a 442 and a 1986 Pontiac Bonneville had the “Bonn” removed and a “D” added to the front to become a Deville.) The ’86 Grand Prix became a GTO.

I bought the Grand Prix/GTO (and all of its rust) from my cousin for $600 and proceeded to beat the snot out of it. After a fresh snow, my gas station coworkers and I regularly took the old Pontiac out to whip donuts in empty parking lots for hours on end, and the car didn’t skip a beat. And, it still took me to work and class reliably and comfortably.

But all good things must come to an end. That spring, the Grand Prix/GTO was sold to make room in the driveway for the collector cars. Had it not been so rusty, I’m not sure I would have ever have parted with it.

I saw the Grand Prix/GTO later that summer when I was in a different city buying 1962 Cadillac parts. It was hard to miss with its rust spots and its silver-painted “GTO” emblem glistening on its quarter panels in the summer sun. I was tempted to knock on the door and see if it was for sale, but I realized it just wouldn’t be the same car to drive without the snow on the ground.



Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:30:08 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Skirting the issue
Posted by Angelo

I’ll just come out and say it – I hate fender skirts. I don’t mind ruffling a few feathers among the skirt-loving crowd, because I have cars that sport them. In fact, the factory required them on some of my cars.

For a guy who doesn’t like these superfluous accessories, I keep finding cars that come standard with them. On both of my 1955 Cadillac coupes and my ’62 Cadillac Coupe deVille, the fender skirts are part of the design, and if they are left off, a huge gaping hole the size of Texas remains. Also, all of the skirt’s attachment bits and pieces are exposed, leaving the car looking like a half-dressed mannequin in a department store window. It’s not a pretty sight.

On Cadillacs, and many other cars sporting skirts from the designer’s pen, fender skirts are integrated as part of the design; they are not an afterthought. In the case of a 1950s Cadillac, it’s easy to see that the designers had a body shape in mind that involved keeping the wheel shielded as part of the body design, and the skirts were required to access the wheel.

What really drives me nuts is when people throw skirts on to their cars when their car shouldn’t have fender skirts. Cars that shouldn’t have fenders skirts make the car look heavier, out of proportion, and detract from the lines stamped into the sheet metal. It’s pretty easy to see when a car doesn’t need fender skirts. Here’s a simple test:

Did the car originally come with skirts? If the answer is no, then proceed.

Is there a lip to the fender opening? If the answer is yes, then the car should not have fender skirts.

Still not on board? Then picture this: a 1955 Chevrolet Bel Air Sport Coupe. The car features some of the best lines of the 1950s, from the close-couple hardtop roof and wrap-around front and rear glass to the downright sexy dip in the top of the fender behind the door. There’s that Ferrari-inspired grille and those handsome triangular taillights that are only slightly highlighted by the shape of the metal below them. And let’s not forget the half-open rear wheel openings that show just enough of the wheel cover, but harmonize with the side trim and front wheel opening. It’s a true triumph of design. Now, add fender skirts – it changes the car, and the effect of the body’s design gets muddied. Worse yet, add rocker trim, a continental kit, accessory bumper guards, spotlights, visor… well, you get the picture.

Like all accessories, fender skirts were tools dealers and the factory used to make money, as the profit margin was large in relation to the cost of the car.

Designers used fender lips like a signature – it showed a sign of completion to the edge of the fender. To add skirts to car with a fender lip, the owner is saying that they know more about design than the car’s designer.
If the car receiving the skirts is being customized and the whole point is to change the car’s shape, then fender skirts are an obvious choice, and it’s a whole different story. But on a restored car, I still say steer clear of fender skirts.

It’s easy to get trapped into the accessory mode, but if you get carried away, your Chevrolet will look as gaudy as Paris Hilton’s diamond-collared, sweater-wearing Chihuahua. And nobody wants to see that.








1955ChevynoskirtA.jpg1955ChevyskirtA.jpg


Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:24:45 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [9]
Google Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links