Free Updates
Search
Navigation
Categories
| November, 2009 (9) |
| October, 2009 (4) |
| September, 2009 (7) |
| August, 2009 (4) |
| July, 2009 (3) |
| June, 2009 (4) |
| May, 2009 (3) |
| April, 2009 (4) |
| March, 2009 (7) |
| February, 2009 (7) |
| January, 2009 (5) |
| December, 2008 (5) |
| October, 2008 (2) |
| September, 2008 (5) |
| August, 2008 (6) |
| July, 2008 (2) |
| June, 2008 (3) |
| May, 2008 (4) |
| April, 2008 (7) |
| March, 2008 (2) |
| February, 2008 (5) |
| January, 2008 (2) |
| December, 2007 (2) |
| November, 2007 (4) |
| October, 2007 (1) |
| September, 2007 (6) |
| August, 2007 (8) |
| July, 2007 (7) |
| June, 2007 (2) |
| May, 2007 (3) |
| April, 2007 (3) |
| March, 2007 (2) |
| February, 2007 (2) |
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Links
|
 Friday, November 30, 2007
Neil Young's 'gross polluter?' Give me a break!
Posted by Angelo
Recently, I was forwarded a link to a CNN article featuring famous musician Neil Young and his plight to install an electric/biodiesel powerplant in his 1959 Lincoln. Apparently, the car’s 430-cid V-8 gets 10 mpg, and Johnathan Goodwin, who is yanking the engine in order to install the hybrid engine, says the new power source will get 100 mpg. He expects the change to take 45 days. Now, I’m all for doing things to make sure our kids have as clean of a place to prosper as we did (I’m an Eagle scout who has planted more trees and picked up more garbage than there are old-car fallacies to be shared), but this article used Young’s project as a chance to attack the old car hobby. Phrases written or quoted by author Sean Callebs include “ gas-guzzling,” “ big polluter,” and “ old, inefficient,” and, like many other who make similar assumptions, infers that American cars are gross polluters. American cars are not necessarily gross polluters. I don’t keep up on modern cars, but even I know that, since at least the early 1990s, Ford has been selling cars that run on E85, and GM has been experimenting with electric cars on the road for years. And Honda, Toyota and Nissan all offer large SUVs, some even big trucks with “gas-guzzling V-8s,” to people just interested in driving them only to pick up kids from soccer practice or fetching basil from the local Piggly Wiggly. Why aren’t these companies considered guilty of offering “gross polluters?” If these companies are so good, why can’t they offer a car that gets the kind of 50-mpg-range gas mileage that Geo Metros offered in the 1990s? People who make the assumption need to visit more than a Honda or Toyota dealership to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the modern automotive market. But I digress. Our old cars are not used frequently. Therefore, the amount of fuel they actually burn and the pollution they create is negligible. I seriously doubt Young is driving his Lincoln enough to worry about the amount of fuel it consumes. Also, car collectors keep their cars in a finer state of tune to better preserve and enjoy them. And good running cars get better gas mileage and spew less emissions. Many non-car people treat their cars like appliances and don’t do preventative maintenance. Their cars only go in the shop when there’s a problem or their cars stop working altogether. And when it comes to being gross polluters, I’m not sure this is true, as I have never seen an emissions test for a 1959 Lincoln, Model T or 1965 Corvette. My personal emissions test experience is limited to a 185,000-mile 1978 Chevrolet Malibu Classic coupe with a 305-cid V-8 that always passed with flying colors. At the same time, I knew many people with much newer four-cylinder cars that struggled to come under the limits dictated by the test. Furthermore, re-using old cars instead of using new energy to build new cars saves energy. Even crushing cars takes energy, not to mention the power used in processing the metal. There are many collector cars that get good gas mileage, and by that, I mean fuel ratings in the 20 mpg range or better. Corvairs, Ramblers, Model T’s and A’s, and even many big, six-cylinder-powered 1950s and 1960s sedans can get good gas mileage. So let’s stop letting uneducated citizens make assumptions about old cars. In today’s dark, political climate when everyone’s rights can be robbed by a loud but influential minority, give people the facts and call them on the carpet when they abuse them.
Friday, November 30, 2007 4:48:25 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Monday, November 19, 2007
Auction action from your recliner
Posted by Angelo
After giving a presentation last weekend to the Minnesota Region of the Antique Automobile Club of America, I noticed that the interest in auctions seems to be growing even more. I'll credit that to the televised auctions that have been cropping up with increased frequency. From my experience this weekend, I can only assume that the interest is wide-spread, so I figured readers of this blog would be interested in the press release I just received and posted below: Russo & Steele's Monterey sale will be aired on ESPN Classic beginning tomorrow, Nov. 20, at 10 pm EST. It looks like the auction has been cleverly broken up into themed episodes, including "fast Fords," "Super Shelbys," "Chevy Performance" and "Mopar Mania." I've always advised people to attend a couple auctions before bidding just to see first-hand how it all works, and this is a good way to get a primer before buying a bidder's pass and raising your hand in the air. Of course, there's no replacement for being there in person, either. If you check out this televised auction, let me know what you think!
Monday, November 19, 2007 9:20:16 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, November 07, 2007
A hot and cold marketplace
Posted by Angelo
Recently, I was asked what the top 10 hottest cars were, and it got me thinking...what are the 10 "coldest" cars, as in, what cars' values are sinking the fastest, or just plain aren't moving? My top 10 hottest cars are below, but I was wondering what you think are the top 10 "coldest" cars. I've given you one "coldest car" to start with: Coldest cars list: 1. Clone cars: These were great driveable alternatives to real expensive muscle cars, but there's no way a clone should be worth anything close to the real thing. Values for clones were dangerously close to those of the cars they replicated, but not anymore. There's nothing wrong with a well-done clone car, but don't pay real money for what is basically a "fake" car.
2. Tell me what you think! Your answer could be here...Hottest cars list: 1. Documented vintage race cars: Speed is always popular among car collectors, but throw in the element of a recorded history of a car, using published articles and photos, and an old car becomes a celebrity. And in the old-car world, celebrity equals dollars. Find a Ford Thunderbolt, and your own hobby celebrity status will increase.
2. Cars built into hot rods and customs before 1960: Building old-style hot rods is currently popular, but if a hot rod is the real thing, throw some zeros behind its value. If the car was built by a famous hot rod or custom car builder, and it appeared in a pre-1960 magazine after it was built, there’s no ceiling on value.
3. Factory concept cars: These factory dream cars have always been valuable, but ever since a GM Futurliner hit $4 million at auction, these cars have begun commanding the kind of respect normally given to 1930s Bugattis and Duesenbergs. Expect that to continue, especially since so few exist, especially in private hands. The Firebird pictured here is in the General Motors collection, and don’t expect it to ever leave.
4. Big-block muscle cars built before 1973: They say there’s no replacement for cubic inch displacement when it comes to power, and that’s also true for value. Mopars, like the Plymouth Road Runner pictured here, are particularly strong sellers right now.
5. 1953-'62 Corvettes: Everybody wants to feel like Todd and Buzz from “Route 66:” they want to cruise down two-lane Route 66, and there’s no better way than to do it in Todd and Buzz’ original ride: an early Corvette. It’s hard to beat these 1950s and ‘60s cars for looks and performance, and collectors already realize that. Expect values to go up from today’s peaks.
6. Muscle Ford Mustangs: Six-cylinder Mustangs are great, and always have been, but the value for high-performance V-8 models, especially Shelby, GT and Boss models are exponentially greater. As with all performance cars, those with their original engines and transmissions command a premium.
7. Volkswagen buses and transporters: There’s more to Volkswagen than Beetles, and VW collectors don’t just love their bugs, they dig their buses. The affection extends back to their hazy, smoke-filled youths, and now that their financial lives have cleared up, they’re willing to pay for those VW buses – through the nose.
8. Documented Shelby Cobras: Shelby Cobras have never been cheap, not even when they were “used” two- or four-year-old cars. And it’s not looking any better. Prices are quickly escalating, and those with well-known race history are seeing their values rise even faster. Right now, the values for early small-block Cobras are rising faster than their big-block counterparts, and financially, the are easier to get into, at least for now.
9. Wood-bodied cars built before 1952: Whether you grew up on an ocean beach or in the United States’ northwoods, woodies warm the heart. Surfers loved wood-bodied station wagons, and families loved hauling the kids and the family dog Spot. Now, those kids want to enjoy the warmth of wood by reliving those Christmas tree hunts and days riding the longboard, just like they used to. And they have the money to do it.
10. 1980s muscle cars: Finding parts (and the money) to keep expensive muscle cars from the 1960s and 1970s on the road is growing more difficult, and many people are looking to the 1980s for their muscle car fix. Parts for these New Wave muscle cars are readily available, even from dealerships, and the cars themselves are inexpensive, although that’s beginning to change. If you like 1980s muscle, get in now, while they are cheap.
Wednesday, November 07, 2007 9:19:12 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
 Thursday, November 01, 2007
A '72 Buick for $48,000?
Posted by Angelo
Yup, as I write this, bidders are battling it out for a 1972 Buick, and it's not a Gran Sport or even a LeSabre convertible -- it's a station wagon like ma used to drive! The auction link came to me via friend Eric Killorin (it's item No. 200165774497). It took me a moment to figure out why this car is commanding so many dollars - it only has 266 miles on it! With that few spins of the odometer, it's a brand-new, NOS 1972 Buick. Now, don't get me wrong, I love "long roofs," and even Buicks. Heck, I've had a few Skylarks from the late 1960s and really appreciate Buick performance. But $48K is a lot of dough for a knicknack. This car is so nice, there's no way you'd want to see the odometer take one more spin. It's just too good to add miles to, and when do you see a 266-mile Buick? Is the car worth $48K? I would never have say yes before this auction. But when are you going to see another one? And even if it doesn't fall into a collector's hands, at $48K, someone's getting a brand new car for the price of a well-equipped SUV. What do you think of this kind of money for a 1972 Buick station wagon? Should the price guides reflect this value? And if you like that Buick's mileage, check out this 128-mile 1972 Oldsmobile Toronado! http://www.auctionzip.com/cgi-bin/auctionview.cgi?lid=347759
Thursday, November 01, 2007 7:48:12 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
|
|
|